China and the US can make nice, if not peace
Washington and Beijing have spent nearly a decade trading tariffs, export controls and blacklists, with each round threatening rupture. Yet they keep recovering from the brink. Tensions soared before summits and plunged immediately after. For example, in 2019 at Osaka, Trump walked back threats to i
Trade & Diplomatic Analysis
-
Decade of Conflict: Washington and Beijing have engaged in ten years of reciprocal tariffs and export controls.
-
Tension Patterns: Geopolitical friction consistently intensifies leading up to major summits.
-
Strategic Recovery: Bilateral relations demonstrate a recurring capacity to stabilize following high-stakes summits.
-
Historical Precedent: The 2019 Osaka summit served as a turning point where trade threats were walked back.
Market & Sovereign Impact
Countries reliant on stable US-China relations face ongoing uncertainty from intermittent tariff threats.
Businesses operating across both markets must manage risks associated with recurring export controls and blacklists.
Geopolitical Strategy FAQs
What has defined US-China relations over the last decade? ▾
The relationship has been characterized by trade tariffs, export controls, and the use of blacklists.
Does summitry effectively resolve US-China tensions? ▾
Summits often serve as points of cooling, though tensions frequently persist or escalate in the periods between meetings.
This dispatch has been curated by Press Glob under international press wire fair-use reporting standards. Access the original reporting directly below.
South China Morning Post
The Hindu
Hindustan Times
Hindustan Times